 |
||||||
 |
||||||
 |
||||||
 |
 |
|||||
 |
NAVIGATION
HOMEFAQ BLOG (kinda) LINKS - HELP » THE OLD RELIGION??? »"WITCH" DEFINED » MATRIARCHY MYTH » BURNING TIMES BULL » SALEM WITCH TRIALS » JOAN OF ARC A WITCH?? » GOOD WITCH"S BIBLE??? » "CHRISTIAN" WICCA » WICCA ISN'T SATANISM » HUMAN SCARFICIES??? » NEOPAGAN HOLI-DAZE » DRUIDS » COMPARITIVE MORALITY » FAMOUS OCCULTISTS » SANTERIA » VOODOO » "HELP! I'M CURSED!" » THE GOLDEN DAWN »FREEMASONRY » ROSICRUCIANS » SATANISM FACTS » ENOCHIAN MAGIC » ALEISTER CROWLEY » NECRONOMICON » OCCULT CRIMES #1 » OCCULT CRIMES #2 » OCCULT CRIMES #3 » GNOSTICS » CABALA DEBUNKED » ISLAM » THEOSOPHY » SCIENTOLOGY » PSYCHIC SCAMS » MORMONISM » HITLER A CHRISTIAN ??? » DAVINCI DECODED » TWO BABYLONS BULL » BIBLE ERRORS ??? » THOSE AWFUL "XTIANS" » EVOLUTION IS O.K.! » KING JESUS » HEAVEN AND HELL » DEMONOLOGY » CELTIC CHRISTIANTY » MIRACLES   |
 |
SO HOW DOES THE AUTHOR OF BABYLON MYSTERY RELIGION REGARD HIS OWN BOOK TODAY? READ HIS OWN REVIEW FOR YOURSELF! [ by Ralph Woodrow From Amazon.com ] "In my earlier Christian experience, certain literature fell into my hands which claimed paganism had been mixed into Christianity. While the Roman Catholic Church was usually the target, it seemed other churches had also been contaminated by customs and beliefs for which pagan parallels could be found. " "The Two Babylons by Alexander Hislop (1807-1862), with its alarming subtitle, 'the papal worship proved to be the worship of Nimrod and his wife,' was THE textbook on which much of this teaching was based. Over the years, this book has impacted the thinking of many people-ranging all the way from those in radical cults to very dedicated Christians who hunger for a move of God and are concerned about anything that might hinder that flow. Its basic premise is that the pagan religion of ancient Babylon has continued to our day, in disguise, as the Roman Catholic Church and is described in the book of Revelation as 'Mystery Babylon the Great'-thus, the idea of TWO Babylons, one ancient, and on modern. Because Hislop's book is very detailed, having a multitude of notes and references, I assumed, as did many others, it was factual. We quoted "Hislop" as an authority on paganism, jut like 'Webster' might be quoted on word definitions." "As a young evangelist I began to share a sermon on the mixture of paganism into Christianity, and eventually wrote a book based on Hislop-'Babylon Mystery Religion.' In time, my book became quite popular, went through many printings, and was translated into Korean, German, Spanish, Portuguese, and several other languages. I came to be regarded by some as an authority on the subject of pagan mixture. Even a noted Roman Catholic writer, Karl Keating, said: 'Its best-known proponent is Ralph Woodrow, author of 'Babylon Mystery Religion'." "Many preferred my book over 'The Two Babylons' because it was easier to read and follow. Sometimes the two books were confused with each other. Letters in a steady flow were received praising my book. Only occasionally would there be a dissenting voice. ONE WHO DISAGREED was Scott Klemm, a high school history teacher in southern California. Being a Christian, and appreciating other things I had written, he began to show me EVIDENCE THAT HISLOP WAS NOT A RELIABLE HISTORIAN. As a result, I realized that I needed to go back through Hislop's work, my basic source, and prayerfully check it out!" "As I did this, it became clear-Hislop's 'history' was often only mythology. Even though myths may sometimes reflect events that actually happened, an arbitrary piecing together of ancient myths can not provide a sound basis for history. Take enough tribes, enough tales, enough time, jump from one time to another, from one country to another, pick and choose similarities-why anything could be 'proved'!" [NOTE: This how many Wiccans, Neopagans, and garden variety occultists justify their beliefs and ideas, too!] "The concern about not having anything pagan in our lives can be likened to a ship crossing a vast ocean. This concern has taken us in the right direction, but as we come to a better understanding as to what is actually pagan and what is not, a correction of the course is necessary in our journey. This is not a going back, but a correction of the course as we follow 'the shining light, that shines more and more unto the perfect day' (Prov. 4:18)." "Although we challenge some of Hislop's claims in THE BABYLON CONNECTION?-this is not intended as an attack against him personally. As far as we know, he was a dedicated Christian, a brother in Christ. Nor is it our goal in writing this book to merely discredit another book. Instead, it is our desire that this effort will help us understand "the way of God more perfectly" (cf. Acts 18:26), find a biblical balance, and glorify Him who said: 'I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me' (John 14:6)." [ From the Back Cover] "THE BABYLON CONNECTION? shows that claims about Babylonian origins often lack connection, takes a closer look at the oft-quoted THE TWO BABYLONS by Alexander Hislop, and provides some much needed clarification on this subject. Was Nimrod a deformed, ugly black man, married to Semiramis, a beautiful white woman with blue eyes and blond hair? Was Semiramis the originator of Soprano singing and priestly celibacy? Was she the mother of Tammuz? Is the cross a symbol of Tammuz? Are round communion wafers sun-symbols? " "Are candles, black clergy garments, the letters I.H.S., the fish symbol, halos, and church steeples of pagan origin? Does the Pope wear a crown with 666 on it? Was the papal mitre copied from the fishhead of Dagon? Does the Book of Revelation describe the Roman Catholic Church as 'Mystery Babylon'?" [ The answer to all of those questions is "no", by the way] I'm not a Roman Catholic. I disagree with many doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church. HOWEVER... You can't seperate 1500 years of Catholicism from Christianity! Get your copy of Ralph Woodrow's NEW book REFUTING Babylonian Mystery Religion! It takes a big man to admit he's wrong! Is Roman Catholicism really "Babylonian Mystery Religion", or is this just "witch-ful thinking"??? Is Catholicism (and therfore all Christianity) Pagan? The priests of Dagon in ancient babylon wore headpieces that looked like fish to depict their god dagon. Are the Mitres worn by not only Roman Catholics, but also Anglican ministers a symbol of Dagon worship??? Nope. The Mitre (i.e, proper nanme for the pointy hats) did not originate until the 14th century....and no one knew anything about dagon or fish hats by then. It was not a carry over from pagan times. Pagan religions were extinct by then, even in the most remote parts of Europe. Sure, a superstition carried on by ignorant farmers existed here and there, but as an organized or "underground" religion, it simply didn't exist. People abandoned Paganism en mass in Europe. The whole "fish hat" theory and other ridiculous claims just don't wash. Coptic and Orthodox churches, having continued in the faith apart from Rome, after the 12th century, do not wear Mitres, which we would expect to see if Catholicism was a carryover from pagan times. But what about the robes? Did Pagan priests wear robes? The depictions of Pagan priests in heiroglyphs don't really look like Christian robes. The idea of the robes worn in Church was to create an appearance of the robes worn by the Old Testament priests. It wsn't inspired by Paganism. Wearing them makes Church not so dull and adds a little color. In fact, many of the so-called "Pagan" traditions that supposedly carried over into the Christian Era are really not so ancient. The maypole for instance, is trumpeted by Neopagans as a prime example of Pagan phallic worship that survived into modern times. This idea is wrong. Ronald Hutton has debunked this idea, stating the Mayploe did not originate until the Middle Ages. Europe was completely Christian by then. The idea of the maypole being "Pagn" came bout through the faulty scholarship of Margrett Murray, who had a very Freudian imagination. A lot of Protestant Christians believe in the "Babylon Mystery religion" line of conspiracy bull, most not knowing any better. True, the Roman Catholic Church has some dark spots on their history...because people are far from perfect. But what happened hundreds of years ago is in the past. Even though I have theological differences with the Roman Catholic Church, they're not guilty of the hysterical conspiracy claims made by Chick publications and others. Common sense can dismiss urban legends about the Vatican causing Communism, Nazism, Islam, the Mafia, World War II, the assassination of Lincoln, the shooting of Pope John Paul II, controlling the "Illuminati", Freemasonry, Jehovah's Witnesses, Jim Jones, and Kathryn Kuhlmyn. For instance everyone knows Communism is atheistic and extremely hostile to Christianity (including Roman Catholics), logically therefore the R.C.C. would not have created them. Pope John Paul II is credited to have destroyed Soviet Communism...which would make no sense if he had hoped to conquer the world through "liberation theology" as the Catholic haters claim. Islam is also intolerant of Christians (including Catholics), and is in fact a rival to it, so it also goes against logic that they created it either. Jehovah's Witnesses are very anti-Catholic, again, not logical to think the RCC created them as well. Since common sense (or perhaps it should be callled "uncommon sense" nowadays) can be used to dismiss most of these stories, we should do just that. Why bother to do this? Because it is impossible to separate the 1500 years the of the R.C.C. from Christian Church History. What many people don't realize is occultists of all types tend to lump ALL Christians together, and simply refer to them as "The Church". Since The Roman Catholic Church is supposedly derived from Ba'al/goddess/Pagan worship they reason, ALL Christianity must be derived from it. I know I used to think this way when I was an occultist, more or less. If you wonder how a book like The DaVinci Code could come about, this is why. It's simply a rehash of ideas occultists of many persusuaions have been touting for years. So I've copied an article here appearing on a Roman Catholic website (Gasp!) to refute these theories. I'm not promoting the Roman Catholic Church (again, I do not agree with them on many theological points- - and no, I'm not "secretly" a roman Catholic) I'm promoting the truth. "If few Fundamentalists know the history of their religion—which distressingly few do—even fewer have an appreciation of the history of the Catholic Church. They become easy prey for purveyors of fanciful "histories" that claim to account for the origin and advance of Catholicism." "Anti-Catholics often suggest that Catholicism did not exist prior to the Edict of Milan, which was issued in 313 AD and made Christianity legal in the Roman Empire. With this, pagan influences began to contaminate the previously untainted Christian Church. In no time, various inventions adopted from paganism began to replace the gospel that had been once for all delivered to the saints. At least, that is the theory." "Pagan Influence Fallacy" "Opponents of the Church often attempt to discredit Catholicism by attempting to show similarities between it and the beliefs or practices of ancient paganism. This fallacy is frequently committed by Fundamentalists against Catholics, by Seventh-Day Adventists, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons, and others against both Protestants and Catholics, and by atheists and skeptics against both Christians and Jews." "The nineteenth century witnessed a flowering of this 'pagan influence fallacy.' Publications such as The Two Babylons by Alexander Hislop (the classic English text charging the Catholic Church with paganism) paved the way for generations of antagonism towards the Church. During this time, entire new sects were created (Seventh-Day Adventists, Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses)—all considering traditional Catholicism and Protestantism as polluted by paganism. This era also saw atheistic "freethinkers" such as Robert Ingersoll writing books attacking Christianity and Judaism as pagan. " "The pagan influence fallacy has not gone away in the twentieth century, but newer archaeology and more mature scholarship have diminished its influence. Yet there are still many committing it. In Protestant circles, numerous works have continued to popularize the claims of Alexander Hislop, most notably the comic books of Jack Chick and the book Babylon Mystery Religion by the young Ralph Woodrow [later Woodrow realized its flaws and wrote The Babylon Connection? repudiating it and refuting Hislop, as mentioned]. Other Christian and quasi-Christian sects have continued to charge mainstream Christianity with paganism, and many atheists have continued to repeat—unquestioned—the charges of paganism leveled by their forebears." "Use of a round wafer implies sun worship?" "Hislop and Chick argue that the wafers of Communion are round, just like the wafers of the sun worshippers of Ba'al. They don’t bother to mention that the wafers used by the same pagans were also ovals, triangles, some with the edges folded over, or shaped like leaves or animals, etc. The fact that a wafer is round does not make it immoral or pagan, since even the Jews had wafers and cakes offered in the Old Testament (Gen. 18:1-8, Ex 29:1-2). " "Unfortunately for Chick and other Fundamentalists, their arguments backfire. An atheist will take the pagan connection one step further, saying, "Christianity itself is simply a regurgitation of pagan myths: the incarnation of a divinity from a virgin, a venerated mother and child, just like Isis and Osiris, Isa and Iswara, Fortuna and Jupiter, and Semiramis and Tammuz. Beyond this, some pagans had a triune God, and pagan gods were often pictured with wings, as was your God in Psalms 91:4. The flames on the heads of the apostles were also seen as an omen from the gods in Roman poetry and heathen myths long before Pentecost. A rock is struck that brings forth water in the Old Testament . . . just like the pagan goddess Rhea did long before then. Also, Jesus is known as the ‘fish,’ just like the fish-god Dagon, etc." Unless the Fundamentalists are willing to honestly examine the logical fallacies and historical inaccuracies, they are left defenseless. Fortunately, like the attacks on Catholicism in particular, all of the supposed parallels mentioned above self-destruct when examined with any scholarly rigor. If not guilty of historical inaccuracies, they all are guilty of what can be called 'pagan influence fallacies.' " "Anything can be attacked using fallacy.The pagan influence fallacy is committed when one charges that a particular religion, belief, or practice is of pagan origin or has been influenced by paganism and is therefore false, wrong, tainted, or to be repudiated. In this minimal form, the pagan influence fallacy is a subcase of the genetic fallacy, which improperly judges a thing based on its history or origins rather than on its own merits (e.g., 'No one should use this medicine because it was invented by a drunkard and adulterer'). " "Very frequently, the pagan influence fallacy is committed in connection with other fallacies, most notably the post hoc ergo proper hoc ("After this, therefore because of this") fallacy—e.g., "Some ancient pagans did or believed something millennia ago, therefore any parallel Christian practices and beliefs must be derived from that source." Frequently, a variant on this fallacy is committed in which, as soon as a parallel with something pagan is noted, it is assumed that the pagan counterpart is the more ancient. This variant might be called the similis hoc ergo propter hoc ("Similar to this, therefore because of this") fallacy." "When the pagan influence fallacy is encountered, it should be pointed out that it is, in fact, a fallacy. To help make this clear to a religious person committing it, it may be helpful to illustrate with cases where the pagan influence fallacy could be committed against his own position (e.g., the practice of circumcision was practiced in the ancient world by a number of peoples—including the Egyptians—but few Jews or Christians would say that its divinely authorized use in Israel was an example of 'pagan corruption'). " "To help a secular person see the fallacy involved, one might point to a parallel case of the genetic fallacy involving those of his perspective (e.g., 'Nobody should accept this particular scientific theory because it was developed by an atheist'). " "Whenever one encounters a proposed example of pagan influence, one should demand that its existence be properly documented, not just asserted. The danger of accepting an inaccurate claim is too great. The amount of misinformation in this area is great enough that it is advisable never to accept a reported parallel as true unless it can be demonstrated from primary source documents or through reliable, scholarly secondary sources. After receiving documentation supporting the claim of a pagan parallel, one should ask a number of questions: " "1. Is there a parallel? Frequently, there is not. The claim of a parallel may be erroneous, especially when the documentation provided is based on an old or undisclosed source. " "For example: 'The Egyptians had a trinity. They worshiped Osiris, Isis, and Horus, thousands of years before the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost were known' (Robert Ingersoll, Why I Am an Agnostic). This is not true. The Egyptians had an Ennead—a pantheon of nine major gods and goddesses. Osiris, Isis, and Horus were simply three divinities in the pantheon who were closely related by marriage and blood (not surprising, since the Ennead itself was an extended family) and who figured in the same myth cycle. They did not represent the three persons of a single divine being (the Christian understanding of the Trinity). The claim of an Egyptian trinity is simply wrong. There is no parallel. " "2. Is the parallel dependent or independent? Even if there is a pagan parallel, that does not mean that there is a causal relationship involved. Two groups may develop similar beliefs, practices, and artifacts totally independently of each other. The idea that similar forms are always the result of diffusion from a common source has long been rejected by archaeology and anthropology, and for very good reason: Humans are similar to each other and live in similar (i.e., terrestrial) environments, leading them to have similar cultural artifacts and views. " "For example, Fundamentalists have made much of the fact that Catholic art includes Madonna and Child images and that non-Christian art, all over the world, also frequently includes mother and child images. There is nothing sinister in this. The fact is that, in every culture, there are mothers who hold their children! Sometimes this gets represented in art, including religious art, and it especially is used when a work of art is being done to show the motherhood of an individual. Mother-with child-images do not need to be explained by a theory of diffusion from a common, pagan religious source (such as Hislop’s suggestion that such images stem from representations of Semiramis holding Tammuz). One need look no further than the fact that mothers holding children is a universal feature of human experience and a convenient way for artists to represent motherhood." "3. Is the parallel antecedent or consequent? Even if there is a pagan parallel that is causally related to a non-pagan counterpart, this does not establish which gave rise to the other. It may be that the pagan parallel is a late borrowing from a non-pagan source. Frequently, the pagan sources we have are so late that they have been shaped in reaction to Jewish and Christian ideas. Sometimes it is possible to tell that pagans have been borrowing from non-pagans. Other times, it cannot be discerned who is borrowing from whom (or, indeed, if anyone is borrowing from anyone). " "For example: The ideas expressed in the Norse Elder Edda about the end and regeneration of the world were probably influenced by the teachings of Christians with whom the Norse had been in contact for centuries (H. A. Guerber, The Norsemen, 339f)." "4. Is the parallel treated positively, neutrally, or negatively? Even if there is a pagan parallel to a non-pagan counterpart, that does not mean that the item or concept was enthusiastically or uncritically accepted by non-pagans. One must ask how they regarded it. Did they regard it as something positive, neutral, or negative? " "For example: Circumcision and the symbol of the cross might be termed "neutral" Jewish and Christian counterparts to pagan parallels. It is quite likely that the early Hebrews first encountered the idea of circumcision among neighboring non-Jewish peoples, but that does not mean they regarded it as a religiously good thing for non-Jews to do. Circumcision was regarded as a religiously good thing only for Jews because for them it symbolized a special covenant with the one true God (Gen. 17). The Hebrew scriptures are silent in a religious appraisal of non-Jewish circumcision; they seemed indifferent to the fact that some pagans circumcised. " "Similarly, the early Christians who adopted the cross as a symbol did not do so because it was a pagan religious symbol (the pagan cultures which use it as a symbol, notably in East Asia and the Americas, had no influence on the early Christians). The cross was used as a Christian symbol because Christ died on a cross—his execution being regarded as a bad thing in itself, in fact, an infinite injustice—but one from which he brought life for the world. Christians did not adopt it because it was a pagan symbol they liked and wanted to copy. " "Examples of negative parallels are often found in Genesis. For instance, the Flood narrative (Gen. 6-9) has parallels to pagan flood stories, but is written so that it refutes ideas in them. Thus Genesis attributes the flood to human sin (6:5-7), not overpopulation, as Atrahasis’ Epic and the Greek poem Cypria did (I. Kikawada & A. Quinn). The presence of flood stories in cultures around the world does not undermine the validity of the biblical narrative, but lends it more credence. " "Criticism, refutation, and replacement are also the principles behind modern holidays being celebrated to a limited extent around the same time as former pagan holidays. In actuality, reports of Christian holidays coinciding with pagan ones are often inaccurate (Christmas does not occur on Saturnalia, for example). However, to the extent the phenomenon occurs at all, Christian holidays were introduced to provide a wholesome, non-pagan alternative celebration, which thus critiques and rejects the pagan holiday. " "This is the same process that leads Fundamentalists who are offended at the (inaccurately alleged) pagan derivation of Halloween to introduce alternative "Reformation Day" celebrations for their children. (This modern Protestant holiday is based on the fact that the Reformation began when Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses to the church door in Wittenberg, Germany, on October 31, 1517.) Another Fundamentalist substitution for Halloween has been "harvest festivals" that celebrate the season of autumn and the gathering of crops. These fundamentalist substitutions are no more "pagan" than the celebrations of days or seasons that may have been introduced by earlier Christians. " "Historical truth prevails" "Ultimately, all attempts to prove Catholicism 'pagan' fail. Catholic doctrines are neither borrowed from the mystery religions nor introduced from pagans after the conversion of Constantine. To make a charge of paganism stick, one must be able to show more than a similarity between something in the Church and something in the non-Christian world. One must be able to demonstrate a legitimate connection between the two, showing clearly that one is a result of the other, and that there is something wrong with the non-Christian item. " "In the final analysis, nobody has been able to prove these things regarding a doctrine of the Catholic faith, or even its officially authorized practices. The charge of paganism just doesn’t work. " The Catholic Church is not the Whore of Babylon pt 1 The Catholic Church is not the Whore of Babylon pt 2 So there you have it. If you think about it, if Christianity was just "Mithraism" or a "Pagan Mystery Religion", why did the Roman Pagans persecute it so fiercely???
MERE
CHRISTIANITY BY C.S.LEWIS You're probably familiar with C.S. Lewis.
He's best remembered for the Chronicles of Narnia, which was inspired
by the Gospel of Christ. Unlike LaVey, Lewis really did have a
doctorate, and was a college professor to boot! Lewis lost his faith
early in life and became an atheist, and later rediscovered
Christianity through his friend J.R.Tolkien (of Lord of The Rings
fame). Mere Christianity is perhaps is best non-fiction work. In it he
presents a thinking person's Christianity, showing you don't have to
ditch your brain to be a Christian!
YOU
CAN DOWNLOAD THE BOOK "136 BIBLE CONTRADICITIONS...EXPLAINED" AS A .pdf
FILE RIGHT NOW BY CLICKING HERE!
Some of the materials on this web site are copyrighted by others, and are made available here for non-profit educational purposes such as teaching, scholarship, and research. Title 17, Ch. 1, Sec. 107 of the US Copyright law states that such Fair Use "is not an infringement of copyright"(click here to read it all). Uncommon Sense Ministries, Inc. is not a church, and is not affiliated with any other organizations. It has no commercial interests and does not solicit donations or contributions. Links to external web sites do not necessarily constitute endorsements, but are provided as aids to research. NONE OF THESE MATERIALS ARE TO BE SOLD. All HTML is Copyrighted by Uncommon Sense Ministries. Permission is freely given to use it by others SO LONG AS IT AS NOT USED FOR PURPOSES PROMOTING ANY FORM OF OCCULTISM OR CULTS. |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
